tijon

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Coty Chypre: fragrant pilgrimage and review

By guest writer Denyse Beaulieu/Carmancanada

When friends complained to Pablo Picasso that the portrait of Gertrude Stein he’d just painted didn’t look like her, he answered something along the lines of: “Don’t worry. It will.”

Though the famous portrait was executed in 1904, well before Coty even dreamt of his mythical Chypre – he’d only just come out with his first fragrance, La Rose Jacqueminot, well anchored in the figurative tradition of perfumery at the time – it is what comes to mind when I try to analyse his 1917 Chypre. Does it in any way resemble its long and illustrious line of descendants, from the me-too Millot Crêpe de Chine or Chypre Sauzé to Jacques Guerlain’s two-tiered answer to his rival, Mitsouko and Sous le Vent, the 1946 double-whammy of Germaine Cellier’s leather-laden Bandit and Edmond Roudnitska’s rich, mulled-spice Femme, on to Christian Dior’s masterful trilogy of Miss Dior (Paul Vacher), Diorling and Diorama (both by Roudnitska), culminating it the very épure of Chypre-ity that is Yves Saint Laurent’s first namesake fragrance, Y…
It would. It will.

Smell Coty Chypre as you would scrutinize the sepia photograph of an ancestor and, yes, you will find the bone structure: bergamot, floral heart, oakmoss and labdanum. But the expression of the face, the inscrutable screen of these eyes and what they were gazing upon, what film passed in front of them as the model posed, how can you penetrate that otherness, sunk in another time?

If Chypre had a gaze, it would have seen the last remnants of the ancient order falling apart. The 19th century rotting in the charnel trenches of the Great War still being fought as it was being composed, bottled and sold; as it adorned the wrists and napes of the last Belle Époque beauties.

Yes, with hindsight, Chypre would come to resemble the family to which it gave its name. But it is set in a world lost to us; a world where heavy blows had already been dealt to our vision of things; the blows out of which the 20th century would emerge. And so it hovers between the old, figurative, narrative order of scent and the invention of modern perfumery – of which François Coty can be said to be the father.

Cubism was already going full steam in 1917. Did Coty like the art? His social and political values would express themselves a few years later, when he bought the daily Le Figaro and used it to express his loathing of communism and his admiration for fascism, Italian style. Though Italian Fascism did, at the outset, attract Modernist movements in art and literature, it would repudiate them for the monumental, pompous art favoured by totalitarian regimes. Perhaps Coty, a powerfully instinctive man as well as a visionary industrialist, had no truck with the Cubists and the Fauves who were the toast of Paris but he did, thanks to his intuition, latch on to the same gesture as his artistic contemporaries. He went primitive; he exhumed the archaic to find the face of modern perfumery. Chypre is not a name chosen by chance: apart from being an island with a powerful perfume tradition (something that the Corsican Coty may well have known), it is the abode of the mighty Aphrodite. Neither the naughty philanderer of late Greek and Roman mythology, nor the slender marble nymph of Classic Greek statuary, or the pearly-fleshed shepherdess of 18th century boudoirs: but the old, stern, primitive, man-eating mistress of the spring renewal of vegetation, the impulse to spring life fed on the death of winter. She sleeps on a bed of earthy moss and pungent herbs, anointed with thick redolent oils of jasmine, bathed in the fumes of sizzling golden resin.

But the goddess is also absolutely modern, in the way that Picasso’s Demoiselles d’Avignon are modern, with their hybrid, primitive African masks and lascivious bordello line-up. François Coty was one of the first – not the first, certainly, for the Guerlains father and son had already used coumarin and vanillin – to fully use the properties of the new synthetics. What’s more, his Chypre is the first step towards abstraction in perfume, which would reach its full expression in Chanel N°5. It doesn’t represent a flower or any other natural odorant; it doesn’t tell a story – unlike its contemporaries, say Guerlain Pois de Senteur or Caron N’Aimez que moi, both launched the same year. Coty had already explored that avenue with his wildly successful L’Origan, mother of the floral orientals, with its methyl-ionone (violet) and dianthine (carnation) accord on an “ambréine” base made of coumarin and vanillin. Edmond Roudnitska called it (I paraphrase, having lost the original reference), “the first modern, brutal perfume”.

Chypre belongs to the same brutal, neo-primitive aesthetics. In the flanks of the 1950s sealed flacon I was lucky enough to acquire, the time-distilled, resinous juice releases a scent that only hints to the later developments of the family. The hesperidic top notes have vanished decades ago, leaving the starring role in the “débouché” – to reprise Roudnitska’s beautiful term – to aromatic herbs, kitchen herbs, really: sage and thyme, and quite possibly vetiver. The floral absolute is jasmine, and it is weighed down with concentrated oils, further pulled into the unctuous base of labdanum, patchouli and oakmoss. In this version, and in the condition it is in, the labdanum’s honeyed, amber notes predominate to pull the composition towards the oriental end of the spectrum. But even in the more modern executions – the 60s eau de cologne, for instance – the amber has pride of place, reinforced by the the vanillin and the hay-like sweetness coumarin. The bitterness and fungus-earthiness of the oakmoss hasn’t yet reached the peak it would when exasperated by isobutyl-quinoline (as in Bandit); or perhaps the vanished bergamot provided the balance between tartness and earthiness. Aphrodite, she of the many guises, is a vegetal goddess: infinitely seductive with her sweet, dizzying fragrances, and willing to take on the adornments of modern chemistry to present a new mask. Her archaic ruthlessness is never far, however, from this attractive surface: Chypre is not a dazzlingly smooth composition like her tawny-flanked daughter Femme would be three decades on, but an assemblage of broad contrasting strokes, grounded on an oriental pedestal of remote antiquity. In a way, it’s amazing that she has given so very different children to so many brilliant perfumers… But she crossed the Mediterranean to visit François Coty in Paris. Perhaps, while kissing him, she bestowed the poisonous gift of hubris, the “sin” (though the term was unknown in Ancient Greece) of exceeding measure and reason through ambition… His disastrous far-right politics and catastrophic divorce ruined Coty, once one of the richest men in the world. He died a pauper. And his Chypre lives on only as a myth – the one scent the majority of perfume lovers dream of seeing risen from the mausoleum of discontinued perfumes – and through her abundant spawn. When you bow your head through time to inhale her essences, it is her daughters you seek. She will come to resemble them. But they can never go back to her utter, arrogant statement.

Pic of Maria Callas from the film by Pasolini "Medea".



Read on the rest of the Chypre Series on Perfume Shrine following the links:


Marble image of Aphrodite, Artemis and Apollo from the Treasure of Siphnians in Delphi, Greece circa 525BC courtesy of arthist.cla.umn.edu

14 comments:

  1. Fabulous, fabulous post. A joy to read. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am sure Denyse will be thrilled.
    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. dinazad15:22

    Superb post indeed! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Divina, Dinazad, thank you so much for the kind words. Chypre was a daunting scent to review, but Helg's series was the best possible occasion to attempt it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I never thought of a Chypre as a scent of the Decadence, but your review places it firmly there. This, I thought, is what the Chateau de Lourps would smell of, as like that fictive place, it plays with a decaying aesthetic and social order ... and from it births something of uncommon, difficult beauty. It was a great defiant >>je m'en fou<< in the face of Coty's contemporaries, a "problem" perfume which, like a unsolved mathematical conundrum, spurs noses on to the increasingly problematic. I am so happy you used the still from Medea. You nailed it. Kudos, ma chère.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear C,

    thanks on behalf of D (who did a very difficult job indeed and honours me with her work) and I am very glad that the choice of Medea was not lost on you ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear C., I actually had to Google the château de Lourps before realizing it was the location in which the hero of Huysmans's novel "A rebours" (in English: "Against the grain") was born. Even though I re-read the book a couple of months ago! It contains a classic and fascinating chapter on late 19th century perfume composition and as such, is recommended reading for literate perfume lovers.
    I wouldn't have labelled Chypre as a decadent composition: to me, it bridges the gap between the 19th century and modern perfumery. But I can certainly imagine the decadent Des Esseintes obsessing over it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Seconding "A rebours" reading ;-) Very detailed descriptions of perfume making.
    And there is a wonderful introduction in the english-translated edition, I later found out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous16:28

    One point must be clarified: the word "chypre" as a special Mediterranean fragrance was not invented by François Coty. It had long been the name of a particular perfume, unexistent in nature, (like "Jockey club", "Russian Leather", "Fougère", "Peau d'Espagne" etc.) CHYPRE is mentioned in Guy de Maupassant's novel "Notre Coeur" (1892). The protagonist Mariolle buys an "eau de toilette au chypre" for the waitress who loves him as a means of improving her tastes by using an everyday but chic fragrance.
    s

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you A for your comment! As an archeologist I am aware of chypre being an ancient recipek, as elaborated in the Chypre Seriespart 1 (and I intend to focus on this past on a subsequent post with a surprise).
    It's always thrilling to find a perfume quote in a novel, though, isn't it! Lovely of you to think of that and mentioning it to us.

    Hope to see you often :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10:49

    If you are interested in literary connections, I can also mention another novel by Guy de Maupassant (yes, he's one of my favorites!). In BEL AMI (1885), among the smells of the crowd in the streets of Paris is - thank God - "Eau de Lubin". An obvious proof of the longtime status of that immortal classic

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks anon, a wonderful addition. It's wonderful to see that Lubin had such a reputation at the time as to be referenced. A double joy actually, as there is also the fragrance by Hermes which was named with the same name later on.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous06:11

    chateau de lourps is also the setting of Huysman's "En Rade" in which it plays a much bigger role - as almost a character itself - than it does in "A Rebours"

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous04:58

    What an incredible review. I especially love the final paragraph, very evocative and beautifully written. I am a classic chypre lover, and that includes Coty Chypre of course. It seems that encapsulated in this one perfume is everything that I love in my other favorite chypres. I find it interesting that Chypre de Coty is so often described as 'Mitsouko without the peach note' because to me they smell completely different. The drydown of my Chypre de Coty EDT resembles Guerlain's Parure most of all (minus Parure's fruityness in the top) to my humble nose. Switching gears a little, I recently sampled two oldies from the house of Millot: Chypre de Millot and Crepe de Chine. Because these fragrances came out in the 1920s before the "chypre" classification had become so strict as it did later on, it seems that during this time period a perfumer's version of Chypre (Cyprus) was more open to interpretation than it was later on. I did not find the base of either of these two classic Millot fragrances to be 'chypric' at all, although they are both classified as chypres. The bases of both fragrances were sweetly woody and were identical to each other - AND identical to vintage Chanel No. 5! This distinctive sweet, woody base accord seems to have been very popular with perfumers working at this time period. Although these two Millot fragrances did have some chypre notes up top (Chypre de Millot was a strong leather chypre before the woody base revealed itself, and Crepe de Chine started as a bracing, sweet green floral), the base was lacking that distinctive chypre accord that I have come to associate with classic chypre. I think perhaps the perfume milieu of that era (and today) was highly competitive and incestuous; it is really fascinating to ponder the evolution of chypre, and the expectations associated with the word "chypre" in times past and today.

    ReplyDelete

Type your comment in the box, choose the Profile option you prefer from the drop down menu below the text box (Anonymous is fine if you don't want the other options) and hit Publish! And you're set!

Blog Widget by LinkWithin